Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) updated us on the extensive process used to develop the new combined TIL/RESPA forms. There is no question about it, the CFPB did exhaustive work designing the new combined forms. I expect the forms will be clearer and much easier to use. But there is one simple fact that Congress and the regulators refuse to grasp – borrowers do not read disclosures and they do not shop for
Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published the first part of a series of articles leading up to the publication of the combined Truth in Lending/RESPA disclosures. The first article looks at the origins of the Know Before You Owe project for simplifying mortgage disclosures. Tomorrow, the CFPB looks back at how the project unfolded. And then very soon, the CFPB will explain the long-awaited new proposed rule to make mortgage disclosures more effective
STATUS OF OTHER PENDING RULES
Category: CFPB, Dodd-Frank Act, ECOA, Financial Reform, HMDA, Regulation B, Regulation C
We received a lot of positive feedback about yesterday’s blog entry on the status of changes to Regulation Z. Several of you inquired about the status of other pending rules, particularly those involving Regulations B and C. Well here you go… Regulation B – The Dodd-Frank Act amended the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) to require financial institutions to report information concerning credit applications made by women- or minority-owned businesses and small businesses. The amendments
Over the next six months Regulation Z will undergo the most extensive revisions in its 43 year history. The rules will primarily impact mortgage loan rules, for both open-end and closed-end credit. For mortgage loan disclosures, it will be the end of the world as we know it and the beginning of a brave new world of Regulation Z. Following is a summary of each piece of the revision process. Ability to Repay– A final
HUD DELIVERS TRIPLETS
Category: Lending Compliance
During 2011 HUD settle cases with two lenders involving familial status discrimination. In both cases women on paid maternity leave were told to wait until they returned to their full-time positions credit could be approved. The first case, in August 2011, cost the lender more than $750,000. The first victim received $15,000, later victims were to $7,500 each. In the November case the victim received $12,000. The lender was required tocreate a fund to compensate
Why we blog . . .
The ever-changing laws, regulations, proposals, deadlines, and guidance are a lot for anyone to manage and keep up with so let us do the work for you. Our blog is designed to help compliance professionals by releasing updates as soon as the news breaks. Our Compliance Resource team is researching, following, and monitoring government agencies and regulators to give you all the latest and greatest compliance news. Our goal is to work harder so you don’t have to.