- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 9 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
From a HMDA perspective…our Audit Department has approached us (Compliance) concerning some underwritten income miscalculations on a few applications (rounding, multiplication, transposition errors, etc.), and they believe these should be HMDA “findings”. However, our stance is that these are not “HMDA” findings as HMDA regulation prescribes that we report the income that was actually used in the credit decision, not what should/could have been used. We have also told them we would not want to misrepresent what actually went down to make the decision as it could adversely impact any analysis utilizing the HMDA LAR, including that which was involved in making their current discovery. Are these HMDA findings? What are your thoughts on the situation? Note it was determined that the correct income amounts would NOT have changed the decision.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.