FORUM PROFILE

Force Placement of Flood Insurance – Junior Liens and First Liens

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #347408
    MGON315
    Participant

    Force Placement Flood Question 8 (i.e., When force placement occurs, what is the amount of insurance required to be placed?) indicates the minimum amount of flood insurance required “must be at least equal to the lesser of the outstanding principal balance of the designated loan or the maximum limit of coverage available for the particular type of property under the Act.

    As we know, if a bank has a secondary lien (e.g., home equity or second mortgage loan)and force places coverage only to the extent of its designated loan, its interest would not be protected if a first mortgage claims priority to any insurance proceeds. Therefore, it’s been my understanding that force placement by a second mortgagee requires coordination with the first mortgagee, as well as the insurance provider and insurer on the first mortgage.

    This seems to contradict the Agencies’ answer to Question 8 denoted above.

    I would like to confirm whether second mortgagees are expected to force place coverage, as applicable, for the 1st as well as the secondary lien. If yes, how might banks accomplish this when they do not have a line of sight to the first lien balance. Our servicer can force place the coverage on the secondary lien, but appear to be putting the onus on us to address any deficiencies related to the first lien.

    Thank you and I welcome your perspectives/advice.

    Best regards,

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #347444

    The secondary lender is not required to force place insurance for another institution’s loan. They must do their own force placing. The challenge you will have under a FEMA policy is that they will pay the first position lien holder first. So if the policy is not sufficient to cover both loans your institution is at risk. However, if you are using a private policy you will want to verify that it is in the name of your institution and doesn’t have the “pay in order” clause.

    NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is intended only for the addressee, and may contain confidential and privileged information either as protected work product or confidential client information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, retain, or disseminate this message or any attachment, and please contact the sender by reply e-mail or at 888.760.5646 and destroy all copies of the original message and attachments. Neither the transmission of this message or any attachment, nor any error in transmission or misdelivery shall constitute waiver of any applicable legal privilege.

    THIS EMAIL AND ITS ATTACHMENTS DO NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE

Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.