Profile for User: pcorder

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 35 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2020 Derby Contest #32599
    pcorder
    Participant

    Storm the Court, Pattie Corder, Monticello Bank, Group 2

    in reply to: TRID: CD and borrower paid PMI #15535
    pcorder
    Participant

    Jack! You are a genius…oh my goodness, I get it now! I ran it through and it’s perfect! Just have to remember to put in 2 payment streams.

    Thanks so much! Thanks to you too, Robin! Y’all have a great week!

    in reply to: 2019 Derby Contest #15251
    pcorder
    Participant

    Please discard 1st pick (Omaha Beach -scratched)…Code of Honor, Pattie Corder, Monticello Banking Company, Group 2

    in reply to: 2019 Derby Contest #15123
    pcorder
    Participant

    Omaha Beach, Pattie Corder, Monticello Banking Company, Group 2

    in reply to: Derby Horse Contest 2018 #12834
    pcorder
    Participant

    Good Magic; Pattie Corder; Monticello Banking; Group 2

    in reply to: Rescindable transaction opinion #12010
    pcorder
    Participant

    We too, have always taken the safe approach, but was challenged by the CEO as a result of it being identified as an exception. He contacted our primary regulatory who agreed with his approach. So, going forward we will not treat as rescindable. Unfortunately, 5 different examiners can interpret the regulation, and have different interpretations. Geez….

    Thank you Rcooper, for your time and effort on this! It didn’t even occur to me to refer to the language in THE LAW. I’m thankful to have excellent resources and support from this group! 🙂

    in reply to: Derby Horse Contest 2017 #10988
    pcorder
    Participant

    Practical Joke, Pattie Corder, Monticello Banking Company, Group 2

    in reply to: Above ground well house #10173
    pcorder
    Participant

    Thank you rcooper! That’s what I was afraid you would say. lol

    in reply to: Derby Horse Contest 2016 #9186
    pcorder
    Participant

    Nyquist, Pattie Corder, Monticello Banking Company, Group 2

    in reply to: ATR Verification of Retirement Account #9016
    pcorder
    Participant

    Excellent! Thank you!

    in reply to: ATR Verification of Retirement Account #9003
    pcorder
    Participant

    Okay, so if we have listed the retirement account in assets on the loan application, but we are not using the retirement account as verification of repayment, and therefore not including it in the debt to income ratio calculation, verification would not be required? (I apologize for beating a dead horse, I just want to be sure I’m thinking about it in the correct way.)

    Thanks for your help, Robin!

    in reply to: Rescission #8879
    pcorder
    Participant

    That was my thought…just needed someone to agree with me. Thanks Robin!

    in reply to: Kentucky Derby Horse #6837
    pcorder
    Participant

    Carpe Diem, Pattie Corder, Monticello Banking Company, Group 3

    in reply to: ATR/Calculating D2I using "fully indexed" rate #6283
    pcorder
    Participant

    Well rcooper, that is not what I wanted to hear, but I suppose I will accept it (reluctantly). LOL

    Thanks again! 🙂

    in reply to: ATR/Calculating D2I using "fully indexed" rate #6280
    pcorder
    Participant

    Thanks so much for your help rcooper,

    We do not offer an introductory rate (or teaser rate) on our ARMs. The initial rate is the index (at origination) + margin.

    I did a little more digging and the Federal home loan bank has defined the “fully-indexed rate” on an adjustable-rate mortgage loan as the calculation adding the margin to an index level at the time the loan is made. [Fully-indexed rate-Index (at the time the loan is made) + Margin (established at the time the loan is made)]

    We use the “Small Creditor QM Portfolio Loans” exemption (1026.43(e)(5), so we must calculate D2I using the maximum interest rate during the 1st 5 years (including any rate cap effect) after the 1st regular periodic payment due date…thankfully, that’s what we are doing.

    But that brings another question to mind…if we use the “inflated” debt to income figure in our ATR calculation and their current D2I is within our policy limits, but the “inflated” is not, should the officer submit a request for an approval to an exception to loan policy?

    It just gets better and better…

    Thanks for your input, always! 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 35 total)