Home » Topics » Truth in Lending/ Regulation Z » ATR – Lending over 43% ATR
Tagged: Ability to Repay - DTI over 43%
- This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 4 months ago by jcomp55.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 6, 2022 at 4:12 pm EDT #37249jcomp55Participant
Good morning,
If a customer is requesting a small home equity loan (under 20K), and that loan will put the total debt to income ratio for the customer at 50%:
Is the lender out of compliance with ATR if they grant the loan to the customer, based on a good faith determination that the customer can repay the loan without hardship? There are no teaser rates, etc.and the loan file would be marked as an exception and documented to the mitigating factors that aided in the decision to extend credit. Our lien would be in second position.
Thanks in advance for any help, it’s much appreciated!
July 8, 2022 at 3:23 pm EDT #37269Kimberly Boatwright, CAMS, CRCMKeymasterWith certain exceptions, the Ability-To-Repay/Qualified Mortgage Rule (ATR/QM Rule or Rule) requires creditors to make a reasonable, good faith determination of a consumer’s ability to repay. Regulation Z currently prohibits a creditor from making a higher-priced mortgage loan without regard to the consumer’s ability to repay the loan. Based on what you describe, it appears you have a made a good faith effort to ensure they can repay the loan.
My question back to you, is based on fair lending. Have you clearly provided in policy/procedures requirements for granting this exception so that if another borrower is in the same situation, it can easily be applied to their loan utilizing similar standards? But in addition, the loan notes documenting the exception match back to FI standards. Hope this helps.
Best,
KimberlyNOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is intended only for the addressee, and may contain confidential and privileged information either as protected work product or confidential client information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, retain, or disseminate this message or any attachment, and please contact the sender by reply e-mail or at 888.760.5646 and destroy all copies of the original message and attachments. Neither the transmission of this message or any attachment, nor any error in transmission or misdelivery shall constitute waiver of any applicable legal privilege.
THIS EMAIL AND ITS ATTACHMENTS DO NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE
- This reply was modified 2 years, 4 months ago by Kimberly Boatwright, CAMS, CRCM.
July 8, 2022 at 3:26 pm EDT #37271elebraParticipantIn my opinion, a debt to income ratio of 50% does not indicate an ability to repay. I would not want to be in a second lien position on this one. The mitigating factors would have to be really good to change my mind and make this loan.
July 11, 2022 at 12:24 pm EDT #37279pcorderParticipantThe home equity loan would be closed end, I’m assuming.
We claim the small creditor exemption, and follow the 8 factor rules. I understood the 43% D2I maximum was out of Appendix Q rules (which we don’t follow).
There are times when we have approved loans with a D2I that exceeds 43%. Our maximum D21 (per loan policy) is 36%. If we exceed the internal policy maximum, it is an exception to loan policy, that must obtain additional approval.
Hope this helps…
July 11, 2022 at 12:40 pm EDT #37280jcomp55ParticipantThanks to everyone for taking the time to answer this questions. It’s much appreciated!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.